The Spin Cycle |
Science |
January 11, 2009
Just wrote an article about the possiblity of the Earth being classified as a star. It seems like a pretty crazy idea but when you look at the facts there is a case to be made for it.
I feel that the biggest argument to say we are not a star is simply because we do not radiate so brightly. Another is that we only radiate significant amounts of radiation due to human activity.
First of the two arguments is an argument about quantities which is always going to come up against some sort of grey area. The second argument , on the other hand, ignores the fact the we as humans shouldn't be so quick to think we are seperate from the world we've spawned from. How are we not to be considered part of the Earth?
We'll I guess that's a whole other debate.
Luke is the CEO of Flickspin Media and Editor-in-Chief for the Flickspin writing community. He's a software developer with a passion for web technologies and Internet cultures.
Read more »
"But from heart to heart you will never create. If from your heart it does not come."
By LUKE MCGOVERN
Published: May 5, 2008
The first wrap up on thoughts of the equation for Theory of Everything. The easy part was coming up with the Theory, now it's just getting it out there.
By LUKE MCGOVERN
Published: May 21, 2008
The Universe is multi-dimensional. There are 4 that are common to us, in the form of space-time, but it looks there are whole lot more.
Any Comments?